All sports, all the time
35 posts
The mandatory compound rules were meant to create strategic variety. Instead, they've handed power to a handful of teams who understand degradation better than anyone else.
Read more →
F1 teams keep reaching for the undercut as their default strategic weapon. It stopped being reliable years ago.
Read more →
The 2026 regulations have shifted F1 away from conservation racing - but several teams are still building strategies around a problem that no longer exists.
Read more →
Everyone's debating car pace and driver form. The real gap between McLaren and the field is happening in laps 20 through 40.
Read more →
Mercedes spent two years fixing their car's porpoising. The 2026 regulations just made that work irrelevant.
Read more →
The RB20 era revealed something uncomfortable: Red Bull's car philosophy may be incompatible with anyone who isn't Max Verstappen.
Read more →
Ferrari keeps hiring brilliant engineers and then making the same pit wall decisions. At some point, the car isn't the problem.
Read more →
Race wins feel like progress at Ferrari. History says otherwise - and the 2026 car is already telling the same old story.
Read more →
Everyone credits McLaren's pace. The real story is what Norris and Piastri are doing to rubber in the final twenty laps.
Read more →
McLaren's strategic edge in 2025 wasn't about the car. It was about the decisions made from the pit wall, race after race.
Read more →
Ferrari keeps building fast cars and then throwing away the points. At some point, the car stops being the excuse.
Read more →
A race win feels like proof of something. With Mercedes in 2026, it's closer to a distraction.
Read more →
Ferrari have the car. They may not have the decision-making to go with it.
Read more →
Ferrari's technical talent isn't the problem. The way decisions get made at Maranello is.
Read more →